LUX-Head&Neck 2: A Phase III Trial of Afatinib (BIBW 2992) Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer After Treatment With Chemo-radiotherapy

Brief Summary
This randomised, double-blind phase III trial will be performed in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The objectives of the trial are to compare the efficacy and safety of afatinib (BIBW 2992) with placebo as adjuvant therapy to patients who have received definitive chemo-radiotherapy.
Brief Title
LUX-Head&Neck 2: A Phase III Trial of Afatinib (BIBW 2992) Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer After Treatment With Chemo-radiotherapy
Completion Date
Completion Date Type
Actual
Conditions
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:

1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed loco-regionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), stage III to IVb
2. Unresected tumour prior to chemo-radiotherapy (CRT)
3. Concomitant CRT completed prior to randomisation
4. After concomitant platinum-based CRT, no evidence of disease (NED) on clinical and radiographic examinations
5. Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1

Exclusion criteria:

1. Prior treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted small molecules, EGFR-targeted antibodies, and/or any investigational agents for HNSCC
2. Patients with smoking history of less than or equal to 10 pack years and with primary tumour site of base of tongue and/or tonsil
3. Any other malignancy (except for simultaneous HNSCC primaries, appropriately treated superficial basal cell skin cancer and surgically cured cervical cancer in situ) unless free of disease for at least five years
4. Known pre-existing Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)
5. Pregnancy or breast feeding
Inclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria:

1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed loco-regionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), stage III to IVb
2. Unresected tumour prior to chemo-radiotherapy (CRT)
3. Concomitant CRT completed prior to randomisation
4. After concomitant platinum-based CRT, no evidence of disease (NED) on clinical and radiographic examinations
5. Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1

Gender
All
Gender Based
false
Healthy Volunteers
No
Last Update Submit Date
Minimum Age
18 Years
NCT Id
NCT01345669
Org Class
Industry
Org Full Name
Boehringer Ingelheim
Org Study Id
1200.131
Overall Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Primary Completion Date
Primary Completion Date Type
Actual
Official Title
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib (BIBW 2992) as Adjuvant Therapy After Chemo-radiotherapy in Primary Unresected Patients With Stage III, IVa, or IVb Loco-regionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Primary Outcomes
Outcome Description
Disease Free Survival defined as the time from randomisation until documented tumour recurrence/ second primary tumour (SPT) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Outcome Measure
Disease Free Survival (DFS)
Outcome Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Secondary Ids
Secondary Id
2011-000392-14
Secondary Outcomes
Outcome Description
Disease Free Survival (DFS) rate at 2 years. Probability of being disease free at 2 years in percentage is provided based on Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Outcome Measure
Disease Free Survival (DFS) Rate at 2 Years
Outcome Description
Overall survival (OS), defined as the time from randomisation until death (regardless of cause). Due to the small event rate in both treatment arms caused by the early termination of the trial, the hazard estimate is not interpretable. Hence presented the total randomized and the percentage of patients died.
Outcome Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Outcome Measure
Percentage of Patient Deaths (Overall Survival (OS))
Outcome Description
HRQoL questionnaires focused on 3 scales: Pain scale from H\&N35, Swallowing scale from H\&N35 and Global health status/QoL scale from C30. Improvement was defined as a score that improved from baseline by at least 10 points (on the 0-100 point scale) at any time during the study. If a patient had not improved, worsening was defined as a 10-point worsening at any time during the study. Patients who had neither improved nor worsened were considered as stable. Percentages of patients with improvement in HRQoL are presented.
Outcome Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Outcome Measure
Patients With Improved Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
Outcome Description
HRQoL questionnaires focused on 3 scales: Pain scale from H\&N35, Swallowing scale from H\&N35 and Global health status/QoL scale from C30. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to the first 10-point worsening on the 0-100 point scale. Patients with no deterioration (including those with disease recurrence/SPT) were censored at the last available HRQoL assessment date. Patients with no post-baseline assessments were censored on the day of randomisation.
Outcome Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Outcome Measure
Time to Deterioration in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
Outcome Description
HRQoL questionnaires focused on 3 scales: Pain scale from H\&N35, Swallowing scale from H\&N35 and Global health status/QoL scale from C30. Scoring of the symptom scales/items followed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scoring manual and a linear transformation of the scores to a 0-100 point scale. Higher values are better.
Outcome Time Frame
Baseline and 5 years
Outcome Measure
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores Over Time
Start Date
Start Date Type
Actual
Status Verified Date
First Submit Date
First Submit QC Date
Std Ages
Adult
Older Adult
Maximum Age Number (converted to Years and rounded down)
999
Minimum Age Number (converted to Years and rounded down)
18
Investigators
Investigator Type
Principal Investigator
Investigator Name
Missak Haigentz
Investigator Email
mhaigent@montefiore.org
Investigator Phone
718-920-4826